GitHub Actions vs Jenkins
Both are CI/CD & DevOps automation tools. Here's how their key features, pricing and fit line up, from each vendor's own site.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free plan | Free |
| Best for | Software teams of any size that already host their code on GitHub and want CI/CD without a separate tool. | Engineering teams of any size that want a free, self-hosted CI server and can maintain their own build infrastructure. |
| Team size | 1–500+ people | 2–500+ people |
| Pipeline as code | Yes | Yes |
| Parallel and cached builds | Not listed | Yes |
| Managed build runners | Yes | Not listed |
| Deployment automation | Not listed | Not listed |
| Secrets management | Yes | Yes |
| Approval gates | Not listed | Yes |
| Visit | Visit | Visit |
A missing check may just mean we haven't confirmed the feature yet. Something wrong? Vendors can claim their listing and send corrections.
More GitHub Actions alternatives · More Jenkins alternatives